[1]巢 越.金湖凹陷三河次凹戴南组油气藏烃源条件分析[J].复杂油气藏,2019,12(02):28-31.[doi:10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.006]
　CHAO Yue.Analysis of hydrocarbon source conditions ofDainan Formation in Sanhe Subsag of Jinhu Sag[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2019,12(02):28-31.[doi:10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.006]
点击复制

金湖凹陷三河次凹戴南组油气藏烃源条件分析()
分享到：

《复杂油气藏》[ISSN:1674-4667/CN:31-2019/TQ]

卷:
12卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
28-31
栏目:
油气勘探
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of hydrocarbon source conditions ofDainan Formation in Sanhe Subsag of Jinhu Sag
作者:
巢 越
中国石化江苏油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 江苏 扬州 225009
Author(s):
CHAO Yue
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Jiangsu Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Yangzhou 225009,China
关键词:
烃源岩 油源对比 阜四段 三河次凹
Keywords:
source rock;  oil source correlation;  fourth member of Funing Formation;  Sanhe Subsag
分类号:
TE122
DOI:
10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
三河次凹为苏北盆地金湖凹陷主力生烃次凹之一,古近系阜宁组二段(E1f2)、四段(E1f4)烃源岩已达生油门限,主力含油层系为阜宁组二段+一段(E1f2+1)、三段(E1f3)和戴南组一段(E2d1),储层相对发育,具有稳定的区域盖层,成藏条件优越。利用最新的烃源岩分析化验资料,对三河次凹E1f4烃源岩进行了精细的刻画。油源对比研究表明:三河次凹(E2d)油气主体来自E1f4烃源岩,石港地区发现的油气有E1f2烃源岩的贡献; 三河次凹E1f4烃源岩镜质体反射率大于0.65%戴南组的范围局限在深凹部位。
Abstract:
Sanhe Subsag is one of the main hydrocarbon-generating subsags in Jinhu Sag.The source rocks of E1f2 and E1f 4 have reached the threshold of oil generation. The main oil-bearing strata in the subsag are E1f2+1, E1f3, and E2d1, where reservoirs are relatively developed, the regional caprocks are stable,and the conditions of reservoir-forming are superior.By analyzing the latest test data of source rocks, this paper gives a detailed description of the source rocks of the fourth member of Funing Formation in Sanhe Subsag.The oil-source correlation study shows that the main oil source rocks of Dainan Formation in Sanhe Subsag are from the fourth member of Funing Formation; the source rock of the second member of Funing Formation is contributive to the oil found in Shigang area; the range of Ro more than 0.65% in E1f 4 source rock of Sanhe Subsag is confined to the deep sag.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘世丽,徐焕友,李翔.金湖凹陷戴南组成藏主控因素及成藏模式研究[J].小型油气藏,2007,12(3):1-5,76.
[2] 卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].地球科学与环境学报,2000,22(2):56-59.
[3] 陈安定.苏北盆地油源判别指标研究[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(4):397-401.
[4] 王雨薇,史盼盼.苏北盆地W凹陷阜四段烃源岩研究[J].当代化工,2014,43(11):2437-2440+2456.
[5] 龚永杰,蒋有录,何胜.金湖凹陷东部油源对比研究[J].断块油气田,2008,15(2):16-19.
[6] 李素梅,庞雄奇,金之钧,等.苏北金湖凹陷混合原油的地质地球化学特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(1):11-15+8.
[7] 彼得斯KE,莫尔多万JM著.姜乃煌,张水昌,林永汉,等译.生物标记化合物指南:古代沉积物和石油中分子化石的解释[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:168-170.
[8] 刚文哲,林壬子.应用油气地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:198.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-03-12; 改回日期:2019-05-14。作者简介:巢越(1990—),女,石油地质助理师,硕士研究生,从事苏北盆地金湖凹陷石油地质方面研究工作。Email:chaoyue.jsyt@sinopec.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-25