[1]张 虎,甘 辉.中国页岩气选区评价研究进展概论及思考[J].复杂油气藏,2019,12(02):32-35.[doi:10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.007]
 ZHANG Hu,GAN Hui.Progress of shale gas constituency evaluation research in China[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2019,12(02):32-35.[doi:10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.007]
点击复制

中国页岩气选区评价研究进展概论及思考()
分享到:

《复杂油气藏》[ISSN:1674-4667/CN:31-2019/TQ]

卷:
12卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
32-35
栏目:
油气勘探
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Progress of shale gas constituency evaluation research in China
作者:
张 虎甘 辉
四川省煤田地质局一三七队,四川 达州 635006
Author(s):
ZHANG HuGAN Hui
No.137 Geological Team, Sichuan Bureau of Coal Geology, Dazhou 635006,China
关键词:
选区参数 选区方法 选区评价 页岩气 中国
Keywords:
selection parameters selection method selection evaluation shale gas China
分类号:
TE122
DOI:
10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2019.02.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过调研中国页岩气选区评价相关文献,从选区评价对象、评价层次、公开标准等方面总结了中国页岩气选区评价发展历程,分析了不同学者所提出的选区评价参数及界限值,总结了选区评价方法。调研结果表明:中国页岩气选区评价对象具多相、多层系特征; 选区评价经历了远景区→有利区→核心区→工程甜点区过程; 目前还没有建立各个选区层次的系统标准; 不同学者所采用的参数和参数界限值不尽相同。页岩气选区评价方法主要有综合信息叠合法、权重系数法、地震属性预测法三种方法,综合信息叠合法适用性和操作性强,是最为适用的页岩气选区评价方法。基于以上调研,结合目前取得重大突破的威远、长宁、涪陵地区页岩气勘探开发实践,提出了中国页岩气核心区、工程甜点区的选区评价参考标准,旨在为中国其它区域页岩气选区评价实践提供参考。
Abstract:
By investigating relevant literatures on China shale gas constituency evaluation, the development history of China’s shale gas constituency evaluation was summarized from the aspects of evaluation objects, evaluation levels and open standards, etc., and the constituency evaluation parameters and boundary values proposed by different scholars were analyzed to summarize the constituency evaluation methods. The results show that the evaluation objects of China’s shale gas constituency have the characteristics of multiphase and multilayer system. The selection evaluation has experienced the process of prospect area, favorable area, core area and engineering dessert area. There is no system standard for each constituency level; the parameters and parameter boundary values adopted by different scholars are not nearly the same. The selection evaluation method of shale gas mainly includes three methods: comprehensive information overlapping method, weight coefficient method and seismic attribute prediction method. The comprehensive information overlapping method has strong applicability and operability, and is the most suitable selection evaluation method of shale gas. Based on the above investigation and combined with the shale gas exploration and development practices in Weiyuan, Changning and Fuling areas where significant breakthroughs have been made at present, the selection evaluation reference standards for China shale gas core areas and engineering dessert areas are proposed to provide references for the selection evaluation practices in other regions of China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邹才能.非常规油气地质[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:130-131.
[2] 蒲泊伶,蒋有录,王毅,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):225-230.
[3] 王丽波,久凯,曾维特,等.上扬子黔北地区下寒武统海相黑色泥页岩特征及页岩气远景区评价[J].岩石学报,2013,29(9):3263-3278.
[4] 张金川,林腊梅,李玉喜,等.页岩气资源评价方法与技术:概率体积法[J].地学前缘,2012,19(2):184-191.
[5] 聂海宽,唐玄,边瑞康.页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J].石油学报,2009,30(4):484-491.
[6] 肖飞,刘洛夫,高小跃,等.库车坳陷中侏罗统页岩气地质特征及有利区预测[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(10):1668-1677.
[7] 谢国梁,刘水根,沈玉林,等.赣东北荷塘组页岩气成藏条件及有利区评价[J].中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(4):704-713.
[8] 梁兴,叶熙,张介辉,等.滇黔北坳陷威信凹陷页岩气成藏条件分析与有利区优选[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,31(2):693-699.
[9] 黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南志留系龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区分析[J].煤炭学报,2009,38(6):782-787.
[10] 刘乃震,王国勇.四川盆地威远区块页岩气甜点厘定与精准导向钻井[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):978-985.
[11] 廖东良,路保平.页岩气工程甜点评价方法—以四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田为例[J].天然气工业,2018,38(2):43-50.
[12] 陈胜,赵文智,欧阳永林,等.利用地球物理综合预测方法识别页岩气储层甜点—以四川盆地长宁区块下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2017,37(5):20-30.
[13] 曾庆才,陈胜,贺佩,等.四川盆地威远龙马溪组页岩气甜点区地震定量预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):406-414.
[14] 张鉴,王兰生,杨跃明,等.四川盆地海相页岩气选区评价方法建立及应用[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):433-441.
[15] 李武广,杨胜来,王珍珍,等.基于模糊优化分析法的页岩气开发选区模型[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(2):184-191.
[16] 赵瞻,李嵘,冯伟明,等.滇黔北地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集条件及有利区预测[J].天然气工业,2017,37(12):26-34.
[17] 张虎.四川盆地威远地区龙马溪组页岩气产能建设目标优选[D].成都:西南石油大学,2015.
[18] 郭旭升.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:89-90.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-10-28; 改回日期:2019-01-29。
第一作者简介:张虎(1986—),工程师,硕士研究生,主要从事页岩气选区评价研究。E-mail:344576395@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-25